It recently realized it negatively affects teenagers, so will it change anything?! We're talking about TikTok!
It recently realized it negatively affects teenagers, so will it change anything?! We're talking about TikTok!

 

It recently realized it negatively affects teenagers, so will it change anything?! We're talking about TikTok!

According to unsealed documents from a lawsuit against TikTok, the short-video sharing platform, its officials were aware that the app's features excessively encourage its use, causing negative effects on teenagers' mental health, according to a report from NPR.

Several US states have filed lawsuits against the platform over its negative impact on users' mental health, especially young people and teenagers.

According to Kentucky Attorney General Russell Coleman, the app was designed in a way that makes it an “addiction machine” targeting teenagers who have not yet completed the “stage of developing self-control”.

Leaked documents from a lawsuit filed against the TikTok platform revealed a shocking truth: the company's officials were fully aware that the app's features were specifically designed to increase addiction and excessive use, leading to serious negative effects on teenagers' mental health.

These documents shed light on TikTok's strategies aimed at increasing the time users spend on the app, such as the constant notification system and personalized content that increases the likelihood of addiction.

Also:

According to the documents, the company's internal studies revealed that excessive use of the TikTok app is linked to problems such as loss of analytical skills, impaired ability to form memory and contextual thinking, deterioration of conversational skills and lack of capacity for empathy, in addition to increased levels of anxiety.

TikTok executives are reportedly aware that excessive use of the app can interfere with sleep, work, and school responsibilities, and even “connecting with loved ones”.

It turned out that the time-management tool launched by TikTok was not effective in reducing teenagers' use of the app, as the average time teenagers spent was 107 minutes per day even after activating the tool, which is only slightly less than the previous rate.

According to the documents, the company knew that the tool would not be effective and that the main purpose of launching it was to improve the company's image in the media.

Consequences:

  • Deterioration of mental health: Many studies have shown a direct relationship between excessive use of TikTok and the deterioration of teenagers' mental health, including increased rates of depression and anxiety.
  • Addiction to the app: The app's mechanisms were designed to increase the desire to use it repeatedly, which negatively affects academic performance and social relationships.
  • Legal responsibility: These documents place the company before significant legal liability, as they clearly show its knowledge of the negative effects of its app and its deliberate disregard of these effects.

Reactions:

  • United States: Several US states filed lawsuits against TikTok, demanding compensation for the harm done to teenagers as a result of using the app.
  • Public opinion: This case sparked public outrage and calls for better regulation of social media platforms to protect users, especially children and teenagers.

What's next?

This case is expected to lead to wide-ranging discussions about technology companies' responsibility for the negative effects of their apps, as well as tighter oversight of these companies. It may also push for new laws to protect users from excessive use of social media platforms.

Conclusion:

This case reveals a dark side of the technology industry, where companies seek to make profits without caring about the health and psychological effects of their products. It is essential that governments and relevant organizations take decisive measures to protect users, especially the most vulnerable groups such as teenagers.

Important notes:

  • Ongoing research: There is a need for more scientific research to determine the exact impact of TikTok and other social media platforms on mental health.
  • The role of family and school: Family and school must play an active role in educating young people about the potential risks of using social media.
  • The need for balance: This controversy should not lead to a complete ban on social media apps, but rather to setting clear rules to ensure their safe and responsible use.

Questions for discussion:

  • What are the proposed solutions to limit the negative effects of apps like TikTok on teenagers' mental health?
  • What is the ethical responsibility of technology companies in protecting users?
  • How can parents and teachers help teenagers use social media safely?

Also:

Despite TikTok launching a time-management tool, this tool did not achieve the desired results in reducing usage time among teenagers. After activating the tool, teenagers' average daily usage time remained high at 107 minutes, indicating that the problem is deeper than just setting a time limit. The documents show that TikTok's main goal in launching the time-management tool was to improve its media image, not necessarily to protect users from the negative effects of excessive use of the app.”

On another note

The documents show that TikTok was aware of the risks of what are known as “filter bubbles”, a phenomenon in which users find themselves trapped in negative content after following certain accounts, and the company realized that the algorithm leads users into these bubbles after about 30 minutes of continuous use.

The documents also pointed to challenges in the area of moderation, as internal investigations revealed that some underage girls on the app were receiving “gifts” and “coins” in exchange for providing inappropriate content, and that the company was directing its employees not to delete the accounts of reported users unless they confirmed in their accounts that they were under 13 years old.

For its part

TikTok spokesperson Alex Haurek defended the company, asserting that the lawsuit filed by the state of Kentucky “relies on misleading quotes and outdated documents taken out of context”, and stressed that the platform relies on strict protection measures, including removing users suspected of being underage, in addition to launching features to control app usage time and family control features.